Drone Flights Would Be Managed by Proposed Law

The Proposed Law
The prepared proposal would make it so that individuals would be breaking the law if they flew a drone above city property without very first getting the correct written approval. Perhaps more importantly, the same would hold true for flying it over personal property. The “written permission” provision would make it possible to use drones for things like main photography jobs, but it would make sure privacy was maintained because those affected would have to sign off on it.

slide1

The charges under the proposition aren’t terrifically stringent, but they might prevent civilians from just utilizing drones as they please. The very first time the law was broken, an individual could be handed a written caution. If captured once again, she or he could be fined $100. This would leap to $200 for the next offense and $300 for everything after that.

Which Drones Count?
If the law passes, it wouldn’t apply to all drones. Rather, it will just be used for drones that do not exceed 55 pounds which are used under an altitude of 400 feet. This would theoretically allow the federal government to run drones without breaking their own laws, but the consumer models, which are typically simply a few pounds, would be well under the limit. This would also prevent anyone from arguing that a typical aircraft certified as a “drone” if it was being zipped a remote system.

Privacy Rights
Privacy rights are a big issue in modern America, as numerous technological improvements– computer systems, social networks sites, online banking systems, and the like– might impact them in brand new methods. Camera-equipped drones are merely one of the latest possible offenses of privacy to be considered. It will be important for homeowners of Holyoke, Massachusetts, to take note of this proposition, as that’s where the law could wind up on the books. If it does, it will be appealing to see if it spreads to other parts of the nation.